Active could mean........Staying active, as in betting on a consistent basis.........or.....Active could mean.....Keeping the account active as in "open" or alive.....Only 2 ways to look at it.....
[This message was edited by Hache man on May 19, 2003 at 05:43 PM.]
[This message was edited by Hache man on May 19, 2003 at 05:43 PM.]
Depends.. Active, as in 'keeping an account from being closed due to lack of activity'?
Maybe a play every few weeks would be o.k., or maybe even once a month at the least, depending on how much money is in the account.
Active, as in "account must remain active for 30 days to recieve bonus"? I would say at least 2 or 3 wagers a week. At the absolute minimum, i would say a play a week.
Now, should a player be allowed to roll an account ove the required amount , then let the account sit idle for 28/29 days , then expect that the account has been sufficiently "Active"?
I would say hell no, and send the dipshits name to every other book as a heads up..
Just my opinion of course.
Maybe a play every few weeks would be o.k., or maybe even once a month at the least, depending on how much money is in the account.
Active, as in "account must remain active for 30 days to recieve bonus"? I would say at least 2 or 3 wagers a week. At the absolute minimum, i would say a play a week.
Now, should a player be allowed to roll an account ove the required amount , then let the account sit idle for 28/29 days , then expect that the account has been sufficiently "Active"?
I would say hell no, and send the dipshits name to every other book as a heads up..
Just my opinion of course.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> I would say at least 2 or 3 wagers a week.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>That's the problem, no one knows. What about in football season? If a guy just bets on the Dolphins every week is he active? Well?? I don't know ???
A square like in the example above is going to get snagged in this rule eventually.
A square like in the example above is going to get snagged in this rule eventually.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> Active, as in "account must remain active for 30 days to recieve bonus"? <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>At the absolute minimum, i would say a play a week.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Also
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> Just my opinion of course <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>At the absolute minimum, i would say a play a week.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Also
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> Just my opinion of course <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by jjgold:
Banned4Life no I did not, dont really want to bother reading it either, I do not play at the book even though they get solid write-ups ect. I got plenty of other good books that offer just as much
Good Luck to you Banned4life.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Wait a minute. What do you mean you don't play there? In the switch thread you wrote:
Originally posted by jjgold:
"I am starting to get more cautious with 5 dimes and keeping funds lower their. Good book but on my toes with them."
Banned4Life no I did not, dont really want to bother reading it either, I do not play at the book even though they get solid write-ups ect. I got plenty of other good books that offer just as much
Good Luck to you Banned4life.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Wait a minute. What do you mean you don't play there? In the switch thread you wrote:
Originally posted by jjgold:
"I am starting to get more cautious with 5 dimes and keeping funds lower their. Good book but on my toes with them."
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> In regards to cashing in the bonus? <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Yep, and this applies for a 30-day period from the inception of the bonus...
Personally, I am not concerned with anyone's bonus criteria however, I am troubled when such criteria isn't displayed up-front.
Additionally, I see no need for an "active" time-period requirement...when an adequate "roll-over" amount is all that is necessary.
I think a Bookmaker looks for trouble when he keeps adding rules and terms in an attempt to "protect" his bonus offers.
Judge:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> I think a bet a month would be considered active. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
That's my point...everyone is entitled to their own opinions as to what active or inactive means as it is applied to their criteria...
So, just state such up-front.
Better yet, is to eliminate any criteria based upon "time" and stick to "action" or "amount."
Yep, and this applies for a 30-day period from the inception of the bonus...
Personally, I am not concerned with anyone's bonus criteria however, I am troubled when such criteria isn't displayed up-front.
Additionally, I see no need for an "active" time-period requirement...when an adequate "roll-over" amount is all that is necessary.
I think a Bookmaker looks for trouble when he keeps adding rules and terms in an attempt to "protect" his bonus offers.
Judge:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> I think a bet a month would be considered active. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
That's my point...everyone is entitled to their own opinions as to what active or inactive means as it is applied to their criteria...
So, just state such up-front.
Better yet, is to eliminate any criteria based upon "time" and stick to "action" or "amount."
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Personally, I am not concerned with anyone's bonus criteria however, I am troubled when such criteria isn't displayed up-front. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Good point..
Would be wise for them to post this on the site. Just to avoid the sort of shit that is happening now.
Good point..
Would be wise for them to post this on the site. Just to avoid the sort of shit that is happening now.
